WHY OBAMA WON'T WIN IN NOVEMBER
It has now become fairly obvious that Barack Obama will be the nominee for the Democrat Party. I say fairly because Hillary Clinton is still in the race and gives no indication that she is EVER going to pull out. As such with she and Bubba still around and the track record of shenanigans that follows the Clinton's, there is always a possibility that these two con artists can find a way of arm twisting their way to the nomination, especially at the Convention.
But unless the Clinton's can steal away a perceived miracle Barack Obama will face John McCain in the Fall and the General Election. Personally I want Hillary to stay around as long as possible including the Convention which looks to be her goal because the chaos is good for the GOP and continues to erode support among Democrats for their own party.
Even with the war that is taking place and brewing into a bigger conflict as each day passes, Clinton most likely will finally have to accept defeat come August and Obama will be crowned as the DNC nominee at the Convention heading into the final push leading a party that will be in shambles.
That in itself is one of the first reasons why Obama cannot win in November. The party he will be leading into the General Election is falling apart and even long time supporters are turning their backs on the DNC because of the chaos and bickering that is taking place during the fight for the nomination. Many candidates for House seats are actually starving for donations because of the fight for the top of the ticket.
Daily reports from Democrats who are so disgusted with their party tell of supporters of both candidates who will NOT vote if their candidate loses or will actually vote for McCain. Calls are coming in on a daily bases to the Conservative talk shows like Rush, Hannity, Boortz and others from dissatisfied Democrats who are stating for the record that they will not vote for Barack Obama if Hillary loses BECAUSE of the controversies and Obamas failure to talk in specifics.
Another prime reason that Obama cannot win in November is found in what have become known as the Reagan Democrats. These are Democrat voters who believe in many of the social policies of Democrats but are gun owners, religious and have many fiscal conservative beliefs like less taxation.
The reason they have become known as Reagan Democrats stems from the two elections that President Reagan won in landslides. This large group of Democrats voted for Reagan in both election because they did not favor the direction that the Democrat Party was taking with Carter in 1980 and Mondale in 1984. In both elections they voted Reagan for President and in local and House and Senate races voted Democrat.
Obama has distanced himself politically from the majority of these Democrat voters. His statements just prior to the Pennsylvania Primary about small town America clinging to religion and guns to take out their frustrations concerning the direction of the country, alienated this large group of Democrat voters and the results of the Primary proved this.
Hillary overwhelmingly won the gun owner vote, the church vote and middle class and Union workers. Though she won by less than two percent in Indiana, her victory among this group of Democrat voters was huge. Without the support of the, "Reagan Democrats, " Obama does not stand a chance of winning in November.
This is just the tip of the iceberg for Obama and losing in November. He has the ability to mesmerize an audience of liberal and youth supporters because of his eloquent speeches and ability to stir up liberal emotions. But his rhetoric has absolutely no substance. He speaks in vague generalities and well worded catch phrases of, "hope, change, " and ,"unity, " but without any details as to how this, " grand, " idea will come about.
When one actually digs into his policy it is obviously Socialist with many Marxists beliefs and statements. He sees the Government alone as the answer to everything and the people as followers of the all powerful entity that will take care of their every need or want. Taking away all personal responsibility and giving the Government total reign over every aspect of life.
He, in his generalists, speaks of taking away from those that have, redistributing the, "wealth, " for the good of the whole which is directly from the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848. If one reads the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto and compare them to the Obama policy statements when they can be found the similarities are striking.
Setting aside the Marxist ideas that are presented by Obama which in itself poses a danger that the American public will turn away from, the very vagueness of his campaign and the lack of substance combined with his well documented inexperience will come together for Obama's defeat in November.
He has excelled in the Primaries because his charismatic nature, eloquent speaking ability and calls for complete Government control of all of America's, "troubles, " along with his anti -war stance and call for an immediate pull out from Iraq plays well to the liberal left and much of the core of the Democrat Party.
But in the push toward the General Election this , "message, " will not play well at all with Independents and more Conservative Democrats, both of which he needs in large numbers to be able to defeat McCain and win the Presidency in November.
Additionally the controversies that have surrounded him with Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers and others will not go away as some believe just because he wins the nomination. In fact as November draws closer the scrutiny will escalate revealing more skeletons and re-emphasising those already revealed as more likely voters start to pay closer attention to the election.
McCain has been through several campaigns for National office and he is an open book. Obama on the other hand is still very much a mystery and come September the digging will go even deeper then it has thus far. He has already balked at the scrutiny as he complained about questions concerning his character and association which are legitimate issues when running for the Presidency. But Obama does not consider them important.
The American people do and this Senator from Illinois will discover that his Marxists leanings, government control policies, inexperience, failure to even try to add any substance to his politics and those in whom he has willingly and readily associated himself with both now and in the past refusing to condemn until the polls showed that it was hurting him, all of this combined spells defeat for Barack Hussein Obama.
Ken Taylor
But unless the Clinton's can steal away a perceived miracle Barack Obama will face John McCain in the Fall and the General Election. Personally I want Hillary to stay around as long as possible including the Convention which looks to be her goal because the chaos is good for the GOP and continues to erode support among Democrats for their own party.
Even with the war that is taking place and brewing into a bigger conflict as each day passes, Clinton most likely will finally have to accept defeat come August and Obama will be crowned as the DNC nominee at the Convention heading into the final push leading a party that will be in shambles.
That in itself is one of the first reasons why Obama cannot win in November. The party he will be leading into the General Election is falling apart and even long time supporters are turning their backs on the DNC because of the chaos and bickering that is taking place during the fight for the nomination. Many candidates for House seats are actually starving for donations because of the fight for the top of the ticket.
Daily reports from Democrats who are so disgusted with their party tell of supporters of both candidates who will NOT vote if their candidate loses or will actually vote for McCain. Calls are coming in on a daily bases to the Conservative talk shows like Rush, Hannity, Boortz and others from dissatisfied Democrats who are stating for the record that they will not vote for Barack Obama if Hillary loses BECAUSE of the controversies and Obamas failure to talk in specifics.
Another prime reason that Obama cannot win in November is found in what have become known as the Reagan Democrats. These are Democrat voters who believe in many of the social policies of Democrats but are gun owners, religious and have many fiscal conservative beliefs like less taxation.
The reason they have become known as Reagan Democrats stems from the two elections that President Reagan won in landslides. This large group of Democrats voted for Reagan in both election because they did not favor the direction that the Democrat Party was taking with Carter in 1980 and Mondale in 1984. In both elections they voted Reagan for President and in local and House and Senate races voted Democrat.
Obama has distanced himself politically from the majority of these Democrat voters. His statements just prior to the Pennsylvania Primary about small town America clinging to religion and guns to take out their frustrations concerning the direction of the country, alienated this large group of Democrat voters and the results of the Primary proved this.
Hillary overwhelmingly won the gun owner vote, the church vote and middle class and Union workers. Though she won by less than two percent in Indiana, her victory among this group of Democrat voters was huge. Without the support of the, "Reagan Democrats, " Obama does not stand a chance of winning in November.
This is just the tip of the iceberg for Obama and losing in November. He has the ability to mesmerize an audience of liberal and youth supporters because of his eloquent speeches and ability to stir up liberal emotions. But his rhetoric has absolutely no substance. He speaks in vague generalities and well worded catch phrases of, "hope, change, " and ,"unity, " but without any details as to how this, " grand, " idea will come about.
When one actually digs into his policy it is obviously Socialist with many Marxists beliefs and statements. He sees the Government alone as the answer to everything and the people as followers of the all powerful entity that will take care of their every need or want. Taking away all personal responsibility and giving the Government total reign over every aspect of life.
He, in his generalists, speaks of taking away from those that have, redistributing the, "wealth, " for the good of the whole which is directly from the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848. If one reads the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto and compare them to the Obama policy statements when they can be found the similarities are striking.
Setting aside the Marxist ideas that are presented by Obama which in itself poses a danger that the American public will turn away from, the very vagueness of his campaign and the lack of substance combined with his well documented inexperience will come together for Obama's defeat in November.
He has excelled in the Primaries because his charismatic nature, eloquent speaking ability and calls for complete Government control of all of America's, "troubles, " along with his anti -war stance and call for an immediate pull out from Iraq plays well to the liberal left and much of the core of the Democrat Party.
But in the push toward the General Election this , "message, " will not play well at all with Independents and more Conservative Democrats, both of which he needs in large numbers to be able to defeat McCain and win the Presidency in November.
Additionally the controversies that have surrounded him with Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers and others will not go away as some believe just because he wins the nomination. In fact as November draws closer the scrutiny will escalate revealing more skeletons and re-emphasising those already revealed as more likely voters start to pay closer attention to the election.
McCain has been through several campaigns for National office and he is an open book. Obama on the other hand is still very much a mystery and come September the digging will go even deeper then it has thus far. He has already balked at the scrutiny as he complained about questions concerning his character and association which are legitimate issues when running for the Presidency. But Obama does not consider them important.
The American people do and this Senator from Illinois will discover that his Marxists leanings, government control policies, inexperience, failure to even try to add any substance to his politics and those in whom he has willingly and readily associated himself with both now and in the past refusing to condemn until the polls showed that it was hurting him, all of this combined spells defeat for Barack Hussein Obama.
Ken Taylor
posted by The Liberal Lie The Conservative Truth | 10:08 AM
10 Comments:
We will have to see, but I will point out a couple of things.
1. He took on the Clinton machine that 5 months ago looked unbeatable and he has crushed Clinton. Contrary to what the media has been saying for months, the race has been over for some time.
2. He has raised record millions of dollars with small contributions from the largest number of donors in the history of all campaigns.
3. He has successfully managed a presidential campaign both fiscally and electorally - McCain has struggled at times financially and with his message (you still have 25 percent of voters in states going against him even though there are no other candidates!) and Hillary's campaign and its $20M debt is a joke. Not bad for an alleged "Marxist" - he must be a closet capitalist.
Rob makes some interesting points and do you within the post. The problem is many Americans do not share your or our worldview, just as many in the stupid liberal media do not. The 57 State man has a lot of backing and assistance and cannot be underestimated for one, not one solitary moment.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuZ_5OhWhQ0
I'm curious, what is your explanation for Dem. Travis Childers winning the special election in the 1st Congressional District in Mississippi tonight (Tuesday)?
This comes on the losses of two other Republican seats in what were staunchly Republican districts this Spring.
The Dems are now 3 for 3 in the special elections. In the races in Mississippi tonight and Louisiana about 2 weeks ago, the Republicans tried to paint the Dem candidates and Obama folks - it didn't have an effect as they still won.
Another reason to believe the Republicans are going to be destroyed in the Fall. It will be even worse than in 2006.
Just a note Rob about the special elections. Reagan won in two major landslides yet the same Ind. and Cons Dems who voted for Reagan voted for Dems on the lower tickets.
In a Presidential year the lower tickets most of the time play differently than the top of the ticket.
While I would like to see McCain with large coat tails I know that will not happen. The GOP may break even or possibly pick up a couple of seats and maybe even lose a few. \
The top of the ticket though is not looking good for Democrats.
Otto, I am not in any way underestimating Obama but he has a considerable amout of baggage with more to come as the election gets into full swing in the fall.
This baggage hurts him with Ind. and Cons Dem voters. Unless that changes in the fall he cannot win against McCain.
The Special Elections are not an issue of coattails - they are clearly an indicator of voter rejection of the Republican Party. These were not swing districts - all three were long-time, safe, solidly-Bush loving Districts. If the Republicans could not hold those three seats, the Fall is going to be a Republican bloodbath.
You are underestimating Obama if you actually believe the top of the ticket is not looking good for Dems.
Two months ago you still thought Hillary was going to pull it out. As I said at the time, it was over, but it took you a few more months to recognize it.
When November rolls around I predict there will be a landslide Dem win that takes the presidency, at least 20 more House seats, and at least 5 Senate seats. There will be a clear mandate from the voters for change and for change led by President Barack Hussein Obama.
We'll see.
Oh yeah, the Democratic party is in a shambles. That's why we're 3-for-3 in special elections so far. Woe is me!
I have yet to see Obama speak eloquently. Sue he throws out those key word's, striking a chord in the back of the gullible young minds... but every time I hear him say them, he's stumbling on a bunch of "uh's" and "um's." Hilary is a much better public speaker than he is, so the statement that his smooth talking is one of the reasons people like him, or will vote for him, is irrelevant. Young America is drinking the Kool Aid that is his magical promise of change. Of course nobody knows how that will come about. Universal Healthcare? Don't you think that if that were a plausible way, we'd have that figured out by now? It wont work, unless you want a trip to the hospital to resemble waiting at the DMV. Of course, the left-wing radicals feel that the government should have its hand on everything. Big Brother, 1984, Brave New World? Listen, whether you're a democrat, republican, or independent, you're tired of the way things are going in this country. Everyone is. Obama supporters see him as this wonderful solution and are too proud to see all the truths and tie's to him and his anti-American associations. I've yet to hear anyone say one positive remark or statement about his (now former) church, friends, or past behaviors (Woods Fund, ACORN, etc.). Where did I miss the part where it's ok to do one thing, renounce and separate yourself from it. Then another, renounce-separate, and so on…
Boy...are you out of touch with reality...
Obama did 3 things:
win by the second largest plurality of the past 75 years;
inspire more people to register to vote in the last 6 months than have ever registered in any 6-month period in our nation's history;
inspire more people to cast ballots than have ever cast ballots before in the history of the united states.
And, of course, he won the election quite handily, so much so that every major newspaper and tv station called the election earlier than they've ever called a presidential election before.
You can vote for whichever white candidate you prefer, but the rest of us voted for the one who has revitalized the party.
People like you are the reason why the Republican party is the party of yesterday, narrow, bigoted and out of touch. After this election the Republican party will have to shift towards the centre, like the British Conservative party did after the 1997 election, or risk being consigned to history.
Post a Comment
<< Home