DEMOCRATS SEEKING CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AGAINST FREE SPEECH.
In yet another attack against our freedom of speech Democrats lead by John Kerry, (D Mass), are seeking a Constitutional Amendment to reverse the Supreme Court decision which allows corporations to run campaign adds and donate to campaigns. The 5-4 decision by the court reversed the controversial McCain/Feingold campaign fiance legislation which violated free speech rights by denying corporate participation in campaigns.
Barack Obama made reverence to this during the State of the Union Address which solicited a, "not true," response by Justice Samuel Alito to the total misrepresentation by Obama of the decision as show in the following video.
John Kerry is first seeking legislation that would require corporations to get shareholder permission before using corporate funds to purchase campaign adds or make political donations. I guess the liberal Democrat Senator has forgotten that Labor Unions, who support Democrats, have always used member dues to fund liberal candidates and purchase campaign adds WITHOUT informing dues paying members of where their money is going.
So why should a corporation be required to seek shareholder permission other than the fact that most corporations support Republican candidates and Democrats see this free speech decision by the Supreme Court as a threat to Democrats in future election.
Kerry went on to say in reference to the proposed Constitutional Amendment, "But we may also need to think bigger," Kerry said. "I think we need a Constitutional Amendment to make it clear once and for all that corporations do not have the same free speech rights as individuals." Where does this liberal moon bat get the idea that he and his cronies have the right to decide who has free speech rights and who does not ?
If an individual or a business agrees with a liberal, then they have the right to practice any type of free speech. If an individual or a business disagree with a liberal they are considered hate mongers and have no free speech rights. This is one of the most blatant hypocrisies of liberals. Amending the Constitution in order to facilitate this liberal hypocrisy is not only uncalled for but has no chance of happening.
Even if it gets through the Democrat controlled Senate, which is unlikely, it will never garner enough support by the States in order to be ratified. But the ridiculous notion that Obama lied about in the State of the Union and the move by Kerry and other Democrats to reverse a decision by the Court which corrected a clear violation of the First Amendment again displays the hypocrisy and hatred for freedom that is found on the left side of the political spectrum in this country.
Ken Taylor
Barack Obama made reverence to this during the State of the Union Address which solicited a, "not true," response by Justice Samuel Alito to the total misrepresentation by Obama of the decision as show in the following video.
John Kerry is first seeking legislation that would require corporations to get shareholder permission before using corporate funds to purchase campaign adds or make political donations. I guess the liberal Democrat Senator has forgotten that Labor Unions, who support Democrats, have always used member dues to fund liberal candidates and purchase campaign adds WITHOUT informing dues paying members of where their money is going.
So why should a corporation be required to seek shareholder permission other than the fact that most corporations support Republican candidates and Democrats see this free speech decision by the Supreme Court as a threat to Democrats in future election.
Kerry went on to say in reference to the proposed Constitutional Amendment, "But we may also need to think bigger," Kerry said. "I think we need a Constitutional Amendment to make it clear once and for all that corporations do not have the same free speech rights as individuals." Where does this liberal moon bat get the idea that he and his cronies have the right to decide who has free speech rights and who does not ?
If an individual or a business agrees with a liberal, then they have the right to practice any type of free speech. If an individual or a business disagree with a liberal they are considered hate mongers and have no free speech rights. This is one of the most blatant hypocrisies of liberals. Amending the Constitution in order to facilitate this liberal hypocrisy is not only uncalled for but has no chance of happening.
Even if it gets through the Democrat controlled Senate, which is unlikely, it will never garner enough support by the States in order to be ratified. But the ridiculous notion that Obama lied about in the State of the Union and the move by Kerry and other Democrats to reverse a decision by the Court which corrected a clear violation of the First Amendment again displays the hypocrisy and hatred for freedom that is found on the left side of the political spectrum in this country.
Ken Taylor
5 Comments:
Ken,
"I guess the liberal Democrat Senator has forgotten that Labor Unions, who support Democrats, have always used member dues to fund liberal candidates and purchase campaign adds WITHOUT informing dues paying members of where their money is going.
"
Excellent Point!
Kerry probably hasn't forgotten - he'll write the legislation targeting businesses and exempting Unions.
There is no way the Dems will get the 2/3rds vote in both houses to push their fascist crap!
Hey. I don't normally leave comments, but I just wanted to say thanks for the great information. I have a blog too, though
I don't write as good as you do, but if you want to check it out here it is. Thanks again and have a great day!
Feral Druid PvP
This corruption makes it harder for both Reagan Republicans and Progressive Democrats to achieve the substantive ends that each seeks.
Post a Comment
<< Home