ONCE AGAIN, "THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CHARGE" BECOMES THE CONVICTION BY THE LEFT FOR ROVE

In an article that I posted on July 13 while the Karl Rove debacle was in its prime I mentioned that the left has a bad habit of convicting anyone, especially a conservative based only on the seriousness of the charge regardless of the facts and especially when those facts prove otherwise as is the case with Rove. So... in order do try and keep this non-story alive because of WHO it is about, the seriousness of the charge garbage has surfaced again concerning Rove's Grand Jury testimony which of course was the basis for proving that Rove did not "out" Valerie Plame. The left has charged that Rove perjured himself in the testimony and of course this is all that the Dems are talking about and that the media is reporting. According to the link article in this title from National Review On Line, not only is Rove NOT under investigation for perjury but the question that has surfaced has to do with a conflict in the testimonies of Rove and the Times reporter Matt Cooper concerning whether they talked about welfare reform during the infamous telephone conversation. Rove remembers yes and Cooper remembers no, (go figure!) . Well this conflict of testimony not only has nothing to do with the Plame case but does not even meet the criteria for perjury so once again ....."it's the seriousness of the charge." As long as the left continues to press for these non story items and follow their agenda of attacking the President, however possible, including the coming fight over Judge Roberts nomination to the Supreme Court and hampering the war effort they will continue to find themselves in an ever shrinking minority. So libs....keep up the good work!

Ken Taylor